|
 |
|
|
|
FAMILIES FOR ALL
CHILDREN
(Preventing babies being abandoned in
Belarus) |
|
Headline feedback from inspection visit
January 2007 |
|
|
|
1.
Overall |
|
The Inspectors were impressed with: |
|
|
-
the enthusiasm and commitment of
everyone to whom they had spoken;
-
the hospitality and welcome;
-
the briefing pack and itinerary –
it had been helpful to have a structure
and will be useful as a reference point
when it comes to writing the full
report;
|
|
2. Achieving Project outcomes
|
|
The Inspectors thought that |
|
|
-
the project was achieving what it
had set out to do;
-
in spite of the difficulties
associated with obtaining quantitative
evidence there was considerable
qualitative and anecdotal evidence of
change;
-
the Director of Borovliani
Regional General hospital had noted that
there were now no abandoned babies in
her hospital. (The 7 babies currently in
the baby unit had been the subject of
court proceedings to deprive the parents
of their rights).
|
|
3. Making a difference |
|
Everyone associated with the project had
‘made a difference’. The Inspectors
were particularly impressed by the
parent reference group and the extent to
which they had clearly been empowered by
being involved in the project. They
commented on
|
| |
-
the information poster
-
the befriending system;
-
the self confidence of the
parents;
-
the parents’ positive and
enthusiastic attitude.
|
The Inspectors were aware that the
project workers had been fundamental to
achieving success. It had taken time
for them to settle in to the role and to
build enough experience and confidence,
but they were now promoting the project
to Statutory Centres throughout the
country. Both were enthusiastic and
will sustain the aspirations of the
project when the project comes to an end
and they move on to another job.
|
The fostering network had been
established and used successfully
for short term placements to give
mothers time to ‘sort themselves
out’. Legislation and
regulation are still in their
infancy but a model of working has
been established.
|
An exhibition of publications and
newspaper articles about the project
together with a list of television and
radio appearances were used as a proxy
to illustrate ‘making a difference’.
|
| |
|
4.
Beneficiaries |
|
Participants in the training programmes
(488 to date) had benefited. |
| |
-
They were using the training in
their practice.
-
Materials had been promoted at
conferences
-
The training handbooks were used
as reference documents
-
Professionals from some centres
had, or were proposing to, set up parent
groups.
-
Courses on Grief and Loss,
Assessment and Care Planning, and Play
were identified as particularly helpful.
-
A Russian project has provided
one very effective course.
|
New parents had been interviewed and
commented positively on the support
and information received from the
project workers. The
information had been empowering and
helpful.
|
| |
|
5.
Sustainability |
|
The project is fully sustainable.
Regions in which seminars given by the
project workers have indicated the
action they will be taking to work with
their local maternity hospitals to
support mothers who have indicated a
wish to abandon whether or not the baby
is disabled. Centres with which the
project workers have had contact have
indicated their enthusiasm for promoting
the aspirations of the project even when
funding comes to an end.
Awareness has been raised through all
the media exposure.
Publications have provided a permanent
resource for the country.
|
| |
|
6.
Value for money |
|
This was a relatively small grant and
the money had been used to good effect.
|
| |
|
7.
Reservations |
|
The Inspectors would have preferred to
have seen Dr Sivuha at the end of the
visit rather than at the beginning.
They wondered about whether monitoring
systems were in place to gather
information on progress during the
duration of the project. They would
have liked some thought to be given on
how the long-term impact might be
evaluated?
The difficulty in obtaining data was
noted
They noted the achievements of the
project notwithstanding the challenging
political environment
The multi-agency Steering Group
established in the initial stages of the
project had demonstrated an effective
way of working.
|
| |
|
8.
Conclusions |
|
Well done everyone!
|
|
|